ESTD PERPUSTAKAAN UNTAD
ESTD PERPUSTAKAAN UNTAD
| JudulAKIBAT HUKUM TINDAKAN KURETASE ABORTUS DILAKUKAN DOKTER UMUM TERHADAP PASIEN DI RUMAH SAKIT TIPE D BERDASARKAN PRINSIP-PRINSIP KEADILAN KESEHATAN |
| Nama: ALFIANA RAHMAN |
| Tahun: 2026 |
| Abstrak The regulation of abortion curettage must be carried out by an Obstetrician and Gynecologist, but not all type D hospitals have Obstetricians and Gynecology so general practitioners must take initial action with Perform actions even though they do not have authority. This research aims to find out the legal consequences that may arise from the act of curettage carried out by a general practitioner to patients in Type D Hospitals based on the Principle of Justice. This study uses a normative research method with legislative approach sourced from primary legal materials and secondary to regulations related to abortion curettage. The results of this study indicate that there is a legal vacuum that specifically regulates the curettage, and also the inconsistency of regulations with the reality on the ground. Curettage can only be performed by an obstetrician and gynecologist; however, the reality in the field, especially in the type D General Hospital, is very small percentage of the possibility of obstetrics and gynaecology specialists so that In an emergency, often the general practitioner has to take action. By him it is It is important to distribute the number of obstetrics and gynaecology specialists in all types of hospitals and the formulation of stricter regulations related to curettage in order to In the future, no general practitioner will take advantage of this legal loophole. Keywords: Abortion, Curettage, Legal Accountability, Principles of Justice, |