Perpustakaan
DESKRIPSI DATA LENGKAP
JudulASPEK HUKUM PELAKSANAAN PENDAFTARAN TANAH ELEKTRONIK DI INDONESIA
Nama: SUMARLIN KALA
Tahun: 2023
Abstrak
The problem that will be described in this research is how is the role of the prosecutor in the prosecution process against defendants in corruption cases who fled abroad? And what are the obstacles in the prosecution process for defendants in corruption cases who have fled abroad? To obtain legal material in writing this thesis, it was carried out through library research with a normative juridical approach by studying the laws and regulations and analyzing the role of the Prosecutor's Office in Prosecuting Defendants of Corruption Crimes Who Fleeed Abroad. In finding answers to the problems mentioned above, the researchers found that the role of the Prosecutor's Office in Prosecuting Defendants of Corruption Crimes who fled Abroad has a very crucial role in prosecuting corruption crimes. In accordance with Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the Prosecutor's Office of the Republic of Indonesia, it has been given the authority to exercise state power in the field of prosecution. (KUHAP) in carrying out its prosecution and supported by other legal products such as Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption, in the event that the defendant of a criminal act of corruption flees abroad and if cannot be presented in court, is attended by his legal advisor and the trial can still be carried out through an in-absentia trial. The public prosecutor can still make and read out the indictment against the corruption accused, and the judge can issue a decision. Furthermore, the Public Prosecutor may announce the Judge's decision on the court notice board or the notice board at the Regional Government Office and the decision is notified to the defendant's attorney. As for the inhibiting factors for the Prosecutor's Office in carrying out prosecutions of corruption defendants who fled abroad, among others, because the defendants were abroad, causing difficulties in prosecuting, regarding the issue of assets being transferred to other parties or hidden in other financial transactions so that difficult to trace and related to the absence of an extradition treaty. Keywords: Juridical Analysis, Role of the Prosecutor, Corruption Crime

Sign In to Perpus

Don't have an account? Sign Up