ESTD PERPUSTAKAAN UNTAD
ESTD PERPUSTAKAAN UNTAD
| JudulTINJAUAN HUKUM PUTUSAN PERNYATAAN PAILIT BAGI DEBITOR TERHADAP KREDITOR PEMEGANG HAK TANGGUNGAN |
| Nama: ASMAWATI |
| Tahun: 2022 |
| Abstrak Asmawati, D101 14 626, Legal Review of Bankruptcy Statement Verdict for Debtors Against Creditors of Dependent Rights Holders, (under the guidance of Sulwan Pusadan and Saharuddin). The right of execution of creditors, especially the holder of the insured's rights to the debtor's property that has been made a guarantee by the bankruptcy debtor for his obligations, is stipulated in Article 56 Paragraph 1, Bankruptcy Law Number 37 of 2004. In addition to these provisions, the right of execution of creditors of dependent rights holders is also in Law No. 4 of 1996, concerning the Right of Dependents to and Objects related to land which came into force on April 9, 1996. Article 21 of Law No. 4 of 1996, concerning the Right of Dependents to Land along with objects related to land mentions that if the dependent's rights giver is declared bankrupt, the holder of dependent rights remains authorized to exercise all rights obtained under the provisions of the Law. In further explanation it is affirmed that the provisions of Article 21 of the Dependent Rights Act No. 4 of 1996 are to further establish the position in the holder of dependent rights by excluding the validity due to the provision of dependent rights to the object of dependent rights. In the Bankruptcy Law No. 37 of 2004, there are no provisions governing how article 56 paragraph 1 of the bankruptcy law No. 37 of 2004 with article 21 of the Right to Responsibility Act No. 4 of 1996. As a result of these uncertainties will cause legal uncertainty, especially for creditors of dependent rights holders. To further study, stick to the background of the problem as outlined above. Using normative research methods. Keywords: Legal Consequences, Dependent Rights and Legal Settlement |